Higher education research in embryonic stage
In this context, we analysed the higher education research community in Asia, including its evolution, poles of knowledge and collaborations by analysing all the articles published by Asian affiliated authors in 38 international higher education journals from 1980 to 2012 – totalling 514 articles.
According to our findings, higher education research in Asia has been growing in volume: the number of publications in higher education journals based in Asia more than tripled between the 1997-01 and 2007-11 periods.
However, in relative terms the intensity of Asian-based research continues to evolve slowly and was not notably different in 2007-11 than it was in 1997-01 – 5% to 7% of the world’s higher education research.
This suggests that higher education research in Asia is in a relatively latent state, keeping up with the overall trend of growth in the world publications in higher education research.
Concentrated and limited
When analysing the field of research about higher education in Asia, several differences can be observed between countries.
The 11 Asian countries that published at least 10 publications during the period 1980-2012 – Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, China, Singapore, India, South Korea, Iran, United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia – account for 90% of all articles published in Asia in international higher education journals.
Yet substantial differences exist among these countries. Hong Kong-based higher education researchers publish almost twice as many articles than those based in Japan, which ranks second in terms of the countries with greatest production, and over five times more articles than South Korea, ranking eighth.
On the other hand, some countries in Asia did not account for a single publication and these were based mostly in Central Asia.
The highest concentration level of this dynamism rests in East Asia, which accounts for 50% of all Asian publications. This highlights significant disparities in terms of the development of higher education in Asia at regional and national levels.
Low levels of collaboration among Asian countries were also identified in our research, suggesting a low level of regional integration of higher education research.
The internationalisation of Asian higher education scholars leans heavily towards native English-speaking countries, particularly the United States and Australia.
The role that these countries have in bringing together Asian higher education researchers to collaborate with one another is disproportionately high: they play the role of research hubs for Asian higher education researchers. Asian scholars communicate more with one another through US universities than they do either through other Asian universities or directly.
Collaboration with other regions of the world, such as South America or Africa, is practically non-existent – a surprising result, as it was expected that collaborations would at least be found with South American countries that benefited from Asian diasporas.
Few scholars from few institutions
As the analysis developed, our attention was caught by the fact that a few universities in Asia had a frequent flow of publications in higher education research, while a large number of universities accounted for only one or two publications.
In the last three decades, 66% of Asian universities that reported any articles published had only one article published and 15% had only two articles. This unequivocally highlighted most Asian universities’ infrequent participation in research about higher education.
These findings suggest one or several scholars at a given university at some point in time having an accidental theme of interest that was published in a higher education journal and that was it.
This was typically a ‘one-time only’ event, not the expected dynamics of a committed research community. In fact, only nine Asian universities (3% of those that published articles) have had at least 10 or more articles published in higher education journals from 1980 to the present.
Even more surprising was when the publication weight of some individual scholars in the overall publications of these Asian universities became apparent.
In four of these nine universities, 30% to 60% of all the higher education research publications produced were due to a single academic.
The importance of these individual academics was so extreme that in one case, the moving of a single academic from one university to another led the publications in higher education research of the former university to wane while the latter increased substantially.
The higher education research community in Asia is at an embryonic stage of development and mostly concentrated in East Asia. It is somewhat dispersed, unarticulated regionally and dependent on links with outer regions of the world, particularly with English-speaking countries.
The findings highlighted the still low critical mass of higher education scholars in Asia and the need for incentives to establish higher education research in universities.
These incentives should not only be driven by public policies, but also by Asian universities that have everything to gain by learning how to better manage themselves and contribute to the development of Asian societies.
* Hugo Horta is a deputy director at the Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research at the Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal. Email: email@example.com. Jisun Jung is a post-doctoral fellow in the faculty of education at the University of Hong Kong, China. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. This article is based on "Higher Education Research in Asia: A Publication and Co-Publication Analysis”, recently accepted in Higher Education Quarterly. It was first published in International Higher Education, Number 74, Winter 2014.